<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Adam Schweigert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamschweigert.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamschweigert.com</link>
	<description>Digital strategist interested in the intersection of nonprofits, journalism and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways Brands Are Using Pinterest And 5 Ways They Should Be by Adam Schweigert</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/pinterest-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Schweigert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=286#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Sure, just sent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, just sent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways Brands Are Using Pinterest And 5 Ways They Should Be by Peter Murphy</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/pinterest-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=286#comment-23</guid>
		<description> Hi Adam, I run communications for the Commonwealth Games Federation 
(www.thecgf.com) - we want to try out Pinterest with images from past 
games. To get us off the waiting list, and as you&#039;re an existing user, 
would you send me an invite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hi Adam, I run communications for the Commonwealth Games Federation<br />
(www.thecgf.com) &#8211; we want to try out Pinterest with images from past<br />
games. To get us off the waiting list, and as you&#8217;re an existing user,<br />
would you send me an invite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways Brands Are Using Pinterest And 5 Ways They Should Be by Julie Carter</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/pinterest-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=286#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Benjamin Moore is on Pinterest 
http://pinterest.com/benjamin_moore/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin Moore is on Pinterest <br />
<a href="http://pinterest.com/benjamin_moore/" rel="nofollow">http://pinterest.com/benjamin_moore/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The One Reason Your Business Can&#8217;t Afford To Ignore Google+ by Adam Schweigert</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/the-one-reason-your-business-cant-afford-to-ignore-google/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Schweigert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=409#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Yeah, good points. I&#039;ve always been kind of underwhelmed by Yammer too, so especially for current Google Apps customers an enterprise version of G+ could be really useful (and hopefully a lot cheaper).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, good points. I&#8217;ve always been kind of underwhelmed by Yammer too, so especially for current Google Apps customers an enterprise version of G+ could be really useful (and hopefully a lot cheaper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The One Reason Your Business Can&#8217;t Afford To Ignore Google+ by jmproffitt</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/the-one-reason-your-business-cant-afford-to-ignore-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>jmproffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=409#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Interesting sleuthing through Google results. I guess we shouldn&#039;t be surprised Google is promoting Google+ stuff up the charts.

What I&#039;m actually excited to hear more about are Google&#039;s plans to turn Google+ into an enterprise social platform, competing with Yammer, SocialText and the rest, especially if you use Google Apps.

I&#039;m doing a Google Apps pilot project and deployment right now, and the one thing that&#039;s missing is a Yammer-like social layer. I could buy Yammer, but that&#039;s a few thousand bucks a year (for this client), so it&#039;s not really feasible. But a free add-on to Google Apps? Yes, please! Even if it&#039;s a poor imitation of Yammer.

If the Google+ internal enterprise social layer could also be extended out to the public side of Google+, I can imagine Google winning over more of the professional social media landscape.  Can&#039;t wait to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting sleuthing through Google results. I guess we shouldn&#8217;t be surprised Google is promoting Google+ stuff up the charts.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m actually excited to hear more about are Google&#8217;s plans to turn Google+ into an enterprise social platform, competing with Yammer, SocialText and the rest, especially if you use Google Apps.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing a Google Apps pilot project and deployment right now, and the one thing that&#8217;s missing is a Yammer-like social layer. I could buy Yammer, but that&#8217;s a few thousand bucks a year (for this client), so it&#8217;s not really feasible. But a free add-on to Google Apps? Yes, please! Even if it&#8217;s a poor imitation of Yammer.</p>
<p>If the Google+ internal enterprise social layer could also be extended out to the public side of Google+, I can imagine Google winning over more of the professional social media landscape.  Can&#8217;t wait to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways Brands Are Using Pinterest And 5 Ways They Should Be by Andrew Phelps</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/pinterest-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=286#comment-14</guid>
		<description>pinteresting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pinteresting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways Brands Are Using Pinterest And 5 Ways They Should Be by Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/pinterest-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=286#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Pinterest sounds very interesting, haven&#039;t heard of it before.  Will definitely check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinterest sounds very interesting, haven&#8217;t heard of it before.  Will definitely check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways Brands Are Using Pinterest And 5 Ways They Should Be by Bill Bean</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/pinterest-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=286#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Very helpful post, Adam. Thanks.

Just getting in to Pinterest and exploring, so I don&#039;t have any feedback re: brands. The shopping thing does seem like a &quot;no brainer&quot;. Hard to imagine there won&#039;t be a deluge. Probably would be even more big brand adoption if there had been a few more months for them to develop prior to Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful post, Adam. Thanks.</p>
<p>Just getting in to Pinterest and exploring, so I don&#8217;t have any feedback re: brands. The shopping thing does seem like a &#8220;no brainer&#8221;. Hard to imagine there won&#8217;t be a deluge. Probably would be even more big brand adoption if there had been a few more months for them to develop prior to Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please Don&#8217;t Be The McRib of Facebook Pages by Adam Schweigert</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/please-dont-be-the-mcrib-of-facebook-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Schweigert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=261#comment-10</guid>
		<description>The last part is key. There are definitely a great many very un-sexy parts of big brands that no one particularly wants to &quot;like&quot; or interact with. Finding the friendliest parts of these brands as entry points is absolutely the way to incorporate social in a way that doesn&#039;t feel like a weird add-on. Some smart brands seem to get that, but still too many have a Facebook page...because they think they need to, and try to get a lot of fans...because a &quot;social media expert&quot; told them they need to, but I think the Tide (see what I did there?) is slowly turning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last part is key. There are definitely a great many very un-sexy parts of big brands that no one particularly wants to &#8220;like&#8221; or interact with. Finding the friendliest parts of these brands as entry points is absolutely the way to incorporate social in a way that doesn&#8217;t feel like a weird add-on. Some smart brands seem to get that, but still too many have a Facebook page&#8230;because they think they need to, and try to get a lot of fans&#8230;because a &#8220;social media expert&#8221; told them they need to, but I think the Tide (see what I did there?) is slowly turning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please Don&#8217;t Be The McRib of Facebook Pages by Adam Schweigert</title>
		<link>http://adamschweigert.com/please-dont-be-the-mcrib-of-facebook-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Schweigert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamschweigert.com/?p=261#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking through a similar challenge for a client and I think a number of local pages (in addition to, or perhaps even in place of, one big central brand page) could be the answer. For a lot of big national brands, really.

The value proposition for larger pages has very rarely been about meaningful interaction (it&#039;s much more transactional, deal based, etc.) and there is also often a huge joiner effect in play where people just sign up or &quot;like&quot; something because a lot of other people have done so before them. 

But for brands that want to really have conversations with their customers, I think smaller, more narrowly focused communities may be the way to go.

I think pursuing that strategy echoes (some of our) desire post-globalization to return to the days of smaller, closer-knit communities and brands can definitely take advantage of that impulse if they&#039;re smart about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking through a similar challenge for a client and I think a number of local pages (in addition to, or perhaps even in place of, one big central brand page) could be the answer. For a lot of big national brands, really.</p>
<p>The value proposition for larger pages has very rarely been about meaningful interaction (it&#8217;s much more transactional, deal based, etc.) and there is also often a huge joiner effect in play where people just sign up or &#8220;like&#8221; something because a lot of other people have done so before them. </p>
<p>But for brands that want to really have conversations with their customers, I think smaller, more narrowly focused communities may be the way to go.</p>
<p>I think pursuing that strategy echoes (some of our) desire post-globalization to return to the days of smaller, closer-knit communities and brands can definitely take advantage of that impulse if they&#8217;re smart about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

